Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay in a demand arising from credit taken on inputs and input services attributable to electricity sold and iron ore fine cleared during the relevant period.
Analysis: Electricity was found, prima facie, not to be excisable goods, and the applicability of Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to such clearances was doubted. Iron ore fine was also treated, prima facie, as not clearly exigible on the facts before the Tribunal. At the same time, it was observed that credit attributable to such clearances could still be recoverable in the light of the Supreme Court decision relied upon by the revenue. The plea of substantial time bar was also considered prima facie acceptable.
Conclusion: The applicants were directed to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs, and on compliance, recovery of the remaining amount of service tax and penalty was waived and stayed till disposal of the appeal.