Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim release of detained goods could be granted in a stay application on a prima facie view, subject to a deposit condition, in relation to a duty demand for the period prior to January 2002.
Analysis: The order notes the pre-January 2002 period of demand and refers to Section 11AA and Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, along with Rules 3 and 4 of the Customs (Attachment of Property of Defaulters for Recovery of Government Dues) Rules, 1995. In view of the contention that no prior notice had been issued before detention, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for granting limited interim relief pending hearing of the stay application.
Outcome: The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 8,00,000, and on such deposit the detention order was to stand revoked and the goods released, subject to the further order in the stay application.