Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported pre-shrinking range was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. despite the Revenue's objection that it was capable of use only for flat goods and not for knitted goods.
Analysis: The machine was found to be used for pre-shrinking of flat goods, and that fact was not in dispute. The notification granted concessional duty to pre-shrinking ranges for flat and knitted goods. The objection that the machine was not capable of working on knitted fabric did not dislodge the entitlement, since the machine answered the description of a pre-shrinking range for flat goods and the benefit was available to such equipment under the notification.
Conclusion: The imported machine was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and the Revenue's objection failed.