Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of the confirmed duty and penalty, in the context of the classification of the impugned goods and eligibility to exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The demand had been confirmed on the view that the goods used as rolling mill oil were a specialty oil and not a lubricating oil. The order noted that no different tariff heading had been identified by the department, and the show cause notice as well as the appellate order did not reject classification under Heading 34.03. Since Heading 34.03 covered lubricating preparations and no third category was shown to apply, the goods appeared, prima facie, to fall within lubricating preparations. On that basis, the appellants appeared prima facie entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 12/94-C.E. as amended. The earlier notification relied upon by the department was held to be confined to its own text.
Conclusion: The appellants were held to have a prima facie case, and the requirement of pre-deposit was waived during pendency of the appeal.