Tribunal remands decision denying modvat credit to toothpaste manufacturer job worker for SEZ unit

The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision denying modvat credit to a toothpaste manufacturer job worker for a SEZ unit. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Commissioner to address the appellant's submissions regarding the SEZ unit's entitlement to credit and the Revenue's appeal grounds exceeding the show cause notice. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need to properly evaluate the SEZ unit's credit eligibility under Notification No. 18/04 (N.T.) dated 6th Sept., 2004.

---

---

Issues:
1. Dispute over availing modvat credit on inputs received directly from the supplier.
2. Denial of credit to job worker based on SEZ unit's entitlement to credit.
3. Interpretation of Notification No. 18/04 (N.T.) dated 6th Sept., 2004 regarding SEZ unit's credit eligibility.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the appellant, a toothpaste manufacturer working as a job worker for a SEZ unit, availing modvat credit on inputs received directly from the supplier. The Revenue initiated proceedings objecting to this credit availed by the appellant. The original adjudicating authority dropped the proceedings considering Tribunal decisions and Board Circular. However, the Revenue appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals), who reversed the decision, leading to the present appeal.

The appellant argued that the Revenue's appeal raised new grounds beyond the show cause notice, and the denial of credit was based on incorrect facts. The Commissioner (Appeals) denied credit on the premise that the SEZ unit, M/s. HLL, was not entitled to credit, thus the job worker should not avail it either. The appellant contended that HLL was indeed entitled to credit, but this aspect was not addressed by the appellate authority.

The impugned order stated that SEZ units were not entitled to Cenvat credit during the relevant period. The appellants challenged this finding, citing an amendment to Notification No. 18/04 (N.T.) dated 6th Sept., 2004, which restricted SEZ units from availing credit only for DTA clearances, not for export goods. As the Commissioner (Appeals) did not consider the submissions made by the appellants, the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh decision, instructing the Commissioner to consider the appellants' plea and other submissions in the cross-objection. The issue of the Revenue's appeal going beyond the show cause notice was also directed to be addressed in the fresh proceedings, leading to the appeal being allowed by way of remand.

---