Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether grants received from the Government by a 100 per cent Government company to enable it to function constituted a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.
Analysis: The grants-in-aid were not shown to have been given for the acquisition or creation of new assets. They were received to support the company's functioning and were credited in the relevant profit and loss accounts. Applying the governing test for subsidies, assistance meant for carrying on operations, rather than for bringing a new capital asset into existence, bears the character of revenue.
Conclusion: The grants were revenue receipts and were taxable as income. The answer is against the assessee and in favour of the Department.
Ratio Decidendi: Government assistance given to support the functioning of an undertaking, and not for the creation of new assets, is a revenue receipt.