Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court directs High Court to hear writ petition promptly</h1> <h3>RAVINDRA NATH Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA</h3> RAVINDRA NATH Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA - 2009 (234) E.L.T. 577 (S.C.) The Supreme 2008 Supreme Court of India judgment involves an appeal against a High Court order rejecting a writ petition based solely on delay. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and, after considering the reasons for the delay provided by the appellant, held that the High Court was not justified in rejecting the writ petition without considering its merits. The High Court was directed to hear the writ petition on its merits within three months after the appellant pays costs to the respondents. Failure to pay the costs would result in the appeal being dismissed. The Supreme Court did not review the case's merits, leaving that task to the High Court. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded. The judgment was delivered by Tarun Chatterjee and V.S. Sirpurkar, JJ., with representation by Shri S.C. Birla for the Appellant and S/Shri A.V. Rangam and Buddy A. Ranganadhan for the Respondent.