Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the earlier final order suffered from an error apparent from the record in classifying the imported goods under Chapter 69 instead of Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The plea was based on the contention that the goods imported formed a complete printing unit and therefore fell under Heading 84.17(1). The earlier decision had, however, considered the relevant exclusion under Note 1(b) of Chapter 84 and held that the imported Ceramic Anilox Rolls were articles of ceramic. The authority distinguished the cited Supreme Court decision on the ground that it dealt with different goods and a different exclusionary note, and therefore did not demonstrate any mistake apparent from the record.
Conclusion: No error apparent from the record was made out, and the application was rejected.