Ceramic anilox rolls classified as ceramic articles, not machine parts, leaving no basis for refund.

Ceramic anilox rolls imported as components of a flexographic press were held classifiable under Chapter 69 as ceramic articles, not under Chapter 84 as machine parts, because Chapter Note 1(b) excludes ceramic parts from Chapter 84 even when they form part of machinery. The accessories argument did not change the tariff position once the ceramic character of the goods brought them outside Chapter 84. As duty had been paid under the correct heading, there was no excess payment and no basis for refund, so the refund claim failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether ceramic anilox rolls imported as components of a flexographic press were classifiable under Chapter 84 as parts of machinery or under Chapter 69 as ceramic articles, and whether duty paid on such goods gave rise to a refund claim.

Analysis: The goods were admittedly made of ceramic. By Chapter Note 1(b) of Chapter 84, ceramic parts do not fall within Chapter 84 even if they form part of a machine or appliance. Applying that exclusion, the goods were held to be correctly classifiable under Chapter 69, which covers ceramic articles. As the duty had been paid under the correct heading, there was no excess payment of duty and no basis for refund. The argument based on the accessories rules did not alter the tariff result once the ceramic nature of the goods brought them outside Chapter 84.

Conclusion: The classification under Chapter 69 was upheld and the refund claim failed. The appeal was rejected.

---