Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the hook and loop tapes manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under heading 5806.10 as narrow woven fabrics or under heading 9606.90 as snap fasteners, and whether the matter required fresh factual verification before final classification.
Analysis: Classification under the Central Excise Tariff had to be determined from the wording of the headings read with the relevant Chapter Notes. The crucial factual question was whether the finished tapes satisfied the definition of narrow woven fabrics under Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 58, particularly whether they had selvedges on both edges and met the other prescribed parameters. The record did not contain a laboratory verification on this point, and the dispute turned on a factual aspect that could be objectively tested by drawing samples and obtaining the Central Revenue Control Laboratory opinion. In these circumstances, the existing finding on classification was not treated as conclusive.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, with directions to obtain laboratory opinion, reconsider classification after examining that report and hearing the assessee, and to levy interest if duty is ultimately confirmed under a heading other than 5806.10.