CHA licence suspension justified on prima facie misconduct and delay did not bar emergent regulatory action

Suspension of a CHA licence under Regulation 20(2) was treated as justified where a regular adjudication order and prima facie material showed active involvement in handling import documents, arranging high-seas sale papers, carrying cash for traders, and transporting goods for local delivery, indicating a likely breach of licensing regulations. The delay in issuing the suspension order did not by itself nullify the power to act immediately once the misconduct came to light and had been substantially established. The note therefore records the suspension as a valid exercise of emergent regulatory power in the circumstances described.

---

---

Issues: Whether suspension of the CHA licence under Regulation 20(2) of the CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 was justified notwithstanding the delay in passing the suspension order and the plea that no emergent situation existed.

Analysis: The suspension was preceded by a regular adjudication order holding the involvement of the CHA and its director and imposing penalties. The appellate record also showed that, at the stay stage, part pre-deposit was directed on the basis of a prima facie view that the material on record was sufficient against the CHA and its director. The facts relied upon showed participation in handling import documents, arranging high-seas sale papers, carrying cash from traders to the importer, and transporting goods for delivery in the local market, which supported a prima facie breach of the licensing regulations. The delay in suspension did not by itself negate the power to act immediately once the matter came to light and the allegations had been substantially established.

Conclusion: Suspension of the CHA licence was held to be justified and the appeal failed.

Final Conclusion: The order of suspension was sustained as a valid exercise of emergent regulatory power in the circumstances of proved misconduct.

Ratio Decidendi: Where misconduct by a CHA is supported by a regular adjudication order and prima facie material showing active involvement in unlawful diversion of goods, the licensing authority may invoke immediate suspension powers even if some time has elapsed before the order is issued.

---