Exemption notification exclusion for interchangeable motor vehicle parts denied where claimant failed to prove goods fell outside the exclusion

Notification No. 62/94-Cus. was held inapplicable to parts that were interchangeable with motor vehicle parts because the notification contained an express exclusion for such goods. The claimant failed to prove that the spare parts were meant only for D8K tractors and incapable of use with other motor vehicles, so the exemption condition was not satisfied. The exemption claim therefore failed, and the ratio is that an exemption notification with an express exclusion cannot be claimed unless the goods are shown to fall outside that exclusion.

---

---

Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 62/94-Cus. was available to parts that were interchangeable with parts of motor vehicles.

Analysis: The notification contained an express exclusion that its benefit would not apply to parts which are interchangeable with parts of motor vehicles. The appellant did not establish that the spare parts were meant only for D8K tractors and were incapable of use with other motor vehicles. In the absence of such proof, the condition attached to the exemption was not satisfied.

Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 62/94-Cus. was not available and the claim failed.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification that expressly excludes interchangeable parts cannot be applied unless the claimant proves that the goods do not fall within the exclusion.

---