Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on a prima facie showing that their goods fell under the more beneficial exemption entry rather than the revenue's proposed classification.
Analysis: The appellants received duty-paid chassis, did not avail credit on the chassis or other inputs, and carried out body-building activity before clearance. The record indicated a plausible claim under Serial No. 212 of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 01.03.2002, which applied where vehicles were manufactured out of duty-paid chassis and no credit had been taken, whereas the department sought to apply Serial No. 214. The Tribunal held that when two provisions are available, an assessee may seek the more beneficial one, and the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalties was granted, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.