Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit was available on grey fabrics and other inputs used in the manufacture of processed fabrics exported under bond, and whether the Revenue had any ground to interfere with the refund sanctioned by the lower authority.
Analysis: Grey fabric was exempt from duty, and the scheme of deemed credit was intended to address the absence of actual credit in such cases. The relevant notifications declared yarn, dyes and chemicals as inputs and cotton fabrics as final products. The Tribunal had already held that where the declared inputs are contained in the final products, deemed credit is available even if the inputs are not directly used by the manufacturer of the final products. On that reasoning, the claim that grey fabrics were not declared as eligible inputs did not dislodge the availability of deemed credit when the relevant inputs were contained in the grey fabrics used for processing.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was held admissible, and the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order granting the refund was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the refund order failed, and the appeal stood rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Deemed credit is available where declared inputs are contained in the final product, even if those inputs are not directly used in manufacture, and direct user declaration is not to claim such credit under the applicable notification and rule.