TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms deemed credit for grey fabric manufacturers, rejecting Revenue's rebate claim challenge.</h1> <h3>CCE, Jaipur-II Versus M/s. Paras Textile Industries & Others</h3> CCE, Jaipur-II Versus M/s. Paras Textile Industries & Others - TMI Issues:- Processing of cotton fabrics for export and rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.- Denial of rebate claim by Revenue due to processing from non-duty paid grey fabrics.- Dispute regarding availing credit of duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing grey fabrics.- Appeal against the orders of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) by the Revenue.- Applicability of Tribunal judgments in similar cases to the present case.Issue 1: Processing of cotton fabrics for export and rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002The respondents were engaged in processing cotton fabrics for export and filed a rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. They claimed that the processed cotton fabric was exported after payment of duty, which was paid from accrued deemed credit as per specific notifications.Issue 2: Denial of rebate claim by Revenue due to processing from non-duty paid grey fabricsThe Revenue contended that since the processing was done from non-duty paid grey fabrics, the credit of duty paid on inputs like yarn, dies, chemicals, and packing materials could not be availed by the processors. Consequently, the wrongly availed credit was deemed unavailable for payment of duty on the final processed fabric.Issue 3: Dispute regarding availing credit of duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing grey fabricsThe Revenue initiated proceedings against the respondents to deny the rebate claim based on the above contention. However, the Assistant Commissioner adjudicated the show cause notices in favor of the respondents, sanctioning the rebate claim.Issue 4: Appeal against the orders of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) by the RevenueThe Revenue, dissatisfied with the decisions of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals), filed appeals before the Appellate Tribunal challenging the grant of rebate claim to the respondents.Issue 5: Applicability of Tribunal judgments in similar cases to the present caseThe Tribunal, after considering various decisions, including the case of Mangal Textiles Mills Pvt. Ltd., held that the manufacturer of processed fabrics was entitled to deemed credit of duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing grey fabrics. The Tribunal cited precedents where similar disputes were settled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the availability of deemed credit for grey fabrics used in processing. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the impugned orders and rejected the appeals filed by the Revenue, citing consistency with previous decisions.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment affirmed the availability of deemed credit for manufacturers processing non-duty paid grey fabrics, in line with established precedents and legal interpretations, thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
