Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether turnover tax claimed as deduction from assessable value could be allowed when a part of the claimed amount had admittedly neither been paid nor shown as payable to the taxing authority.
Analysis: Deduction under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) is confined to taxes payable on the goods. The expression relied upon by the assessee in earlier decisions on average or equalised tax treatment does not dispense with the requirement that the deduction must represent genuine tax incidence. Where the assessee admits that a substantial portion of the claimed turnover tax was neither paid nor payable for the relevant period, that amount cannot be treated as deductible. The principle allowing deduction of taxes paid periodically or on a provisional basis does not support a claim for an amount that is not shown to be payable to the authority. The authorities cited by the assessee were distinguished as they contemplated taxes actually proved to have been paid or genuinely equalised.
Conclusion: The disputed turnover tax amount was not deductible from assessable value and the Revenue's challenge succeeds.
Final Conclusion: The order dropping the demand was set aside, and the Revenue was granted relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Only taxes actually payable and shown to be genuine can be deducted from assessable value; an amount admittedly neither paid nor payable for the relevant period is not deductible.