Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excise duty demand, interest and penalty could be sustained when the classification of the product as pig fat under sub-heading 0201.00 had already attained finality and excluded the product from Chapter 15.
Analysis: The product classification had been decided in separate proceedings, and the order holding it to be pig fat under sub-heading 0201.00 had not been appealed against. That determination therefore became final. Once the classification issue had attained finality, the revenue authorities could not reopen it indirectly in the demand proceedings or proceed on the contrary assumption that the product fell under sub-heading 1501.00. Since the demand itself was founded on the now impermissible classification, the basis for excise duty, interest and penalty disappeared.
Conclusion: The demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained and the assessee succeeded on the classification-linked liability issue.