Appeal Dismissed Due to Counsel's Adjournment Requests & Lack of Details The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai due to multiple adjournments requested by the appellant's counsel. The counsel's ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed Due to Counsel's Adjournment Requests & Lack of Details
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai due to multiple adjournments requested by the appellant's counsel. The counsel's failure to provide specific details of a connected High Court case and lack of instructions from the party resulted in no further adjournment being allowed, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai dismissed the appeal due to multiple adjournments requested by the appellant's counsel. The counsel failed to provide specific details of a connected High Court case and had no instructions from the party. No further adjournment was allowed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.