Capital receipt treatment for compensation tied to relinquishing a right to sue, outside sections 41(1), 68 and 28(va).

A receipt arising from settlement of development-right disputes was analysed as a capital receipt where the amount was received earlier, consistently credited as a liability, and no deduction had ever been allowed for any trading liability. Section 41(1) did not apply because there was no prior allowance or deduction to trigger remission or cessation taxation. Section 68 was inapplicable because the payer's identity and the receipt were established. The compensation was treated as consideration for foregoing a right to sue, and a mere right to sue is not a transferable capital asset under section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Section 28(va) was also held inapplicable because it covers non-compete and similar restraints, not surrender of litigation rights.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 2.93 crores received in connection with development rights and later credited to the capital account was taxable under section 41(1), section 68, or section 28(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or was a non-taxable capital receipt arising from relinquishment of the right to sue.

Analysis: The amount had been received in an earlier year and shown consistently as a liability, without any claim of deduction or allowance in respect of a trading liability. Section 41(1) applies only where an allowance or deduction had earlier been granted in respect of a loss, expenditure, or trading liability, and its remission or cessation is brought to tax. That condition was absent. Section 68 also could not apply because the identity of the payer and the receipt itself were established. On the merits, the settlement reflected compensation for not enforcing the right to sue in respect of a disputed property transaction. A mere right to sue is not a transferable capital asset within the meaning of section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and such compensation is not consideration for a transfer of a capital asset. Section 28(va) is confined to non-compete and similar business restraint receipts and does not cover compensation for foregoing litigation rights.

Conclusion: The receipt was not taxable under section 41(1), section 68, or section 28(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and was to be treated as a capital receipt in favour of the assessee.

---