Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether similar duty concession was admissible in respect of aviation turbine fuel supplied to airlines of Nepal and Bhutan under the notification issued under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The notification under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 granted rebate of central excise duty paid on aviation turbine fuel supplied to foreign airlines, excluding airlines of Nepal and Bhutan. The adjudicating authority had already extended similar treatment in the appellants' own case in revision, acting on the relevant executive instructions. Since that revisionary order was not shown to have been challenged, consistency required that the same benefit be extended in the present matters as well.
Conclusion: Similar treatment was directed to be extended to the appellants, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.