Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product FUNDA was classifiable under Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as sugar confectionery, or under Chapter 21 as a food preparation under the residuary entry.
Analysis: The product was found to contain nearly 99% sugar and to be very similar to Glucose D, which was covered by the Board's circular under Chapter 17. The lower authorities had not examined this similarity adequately. Chapter 21.06 is a residuary heading and can be applied only when the goods are not classifiable elsewhere. On the examples listed in Note 6 to Chapter 21, the product did not fall within the class of Misthans, Mithai, Namkeens, Mixtures, Bhujia or Chabena. Applying the principle of ejusdem generis, the product could not be brought within Chapter 21.06.
Conclusion: FUNDA was held not classifiable under Chapter 21 and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.