Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit in relation to denial of the compounded levy scheme benefit under Notification No. 32/2001-C.E. dated 28-6-2001.
Analysis: The relevant condition in para 7(1) required an independent textile processor to apply prior to commencement of commercial production. The appellant's commercial production commenced only on 23-8-2001, while the application for the notification benefit was made on 16-8-2001, thus satisfying the express requirement of para 7(1). Para 7(2), dealing with processing factories existing as on 1-5-2001, was held inapplicable because mere excise registration before production did not establish that the unit was an existing processing factory for that purpose.
Conclusion: The appellant made out a prima facie case for unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit.