Appellate Tribunal Upholds Penalty Decision, Rule 25, CESTAT Kolkata The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Kolkata, as Rule 25 does not specify a minimum penalty, only a maximum penalty not exceeding the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Kolkata, as Rule 25 does not specify a minimum penalty, only a maximum penalty not exceeding the duty amount or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher. The decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty to Rs. 1,000 was upheld.
The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Kolkata, rejected the appeal as Rule 25 does not prescribe a minimum penalty, only a maximum penalty that should not exceed the duty amount or Rs. 10,000, whichever is greater. The Commissioner (Appeals) reducing the penalty to Rs. 1,000 was valid.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.