Aggregate clearances and partnership identity controlled exemption eligibility, leading to refusal of full pre-deposit waiver.

Aggregate clearances from a manufacturer's factories had to be counted for exemption eligibility under Notification No. 1/1993, and clearances from a sole proprietorship and a partnership concern could not be treated as separate where the appellant was both a partner and an individual manufacturer. Because a partnership firm has no separate legal entity and the partners manufacture collectively in the firm's name, the firm's clearances were relevant to the exemption-limit computation. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit for duty and penalty was refused, though conditional waiver was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 and the balance remaining stayed during the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand and penalty, and whether the clearances of the sole proprietorship and the partnership concern could be treated separately for the purpose of the exemption limit under Notification No. 1/1993.

Analysis: The appellant was a partner in the firm and also carried on manufacturing activity as a sole proprietor in her own factory. For the purpose of the notification, the aggregate value of clearances from one or more factories by a manufacturer in a financial year could not exceed the prescribed limit. Since a partnership firm does not have a separate legal entity and the partners manufacture collectively in the name of the firm, the clearances could not be ignored for determining eligibility to the benefit claimed. On that basis, full waiver of pre-deposit was not justified.

Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but conditional waiver was granted on deposit of Rs. 1,00,000, with the balance duty and penalty stayed during pendency of the appeal.

---