Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties in view of the classification of the goods under Chapter Heading 84.24 and the claimed exemption.
Analysis: The goods in question were treated as falling under Chapter Heading 84.24 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and had already been regarded in earlier proceedings as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 46/94. On that basis, the existence of alleged clandestine removal did not, at this stage, justify confirmation of duty for the disputed period, because the goods were already considered exempt from payment of duty. This constituted a strong prima facie case for relief from the pre-deposit requirement.
Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties, and recovery was stayed pending the appeals.