Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on an electrostatic powder coating outfit falling under Chapter heading 8424.80, in the absence of proof that it was a fire extinguisher excluded by Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The relevant exclusion under Rule 57Q applied only to fire extinguishers covered by the specified sub-heading. The item in question was treated as machinery used in manufacture and not as a fire extinguisher. Since the exclusion did not match the actual use and character of the equipment, there was no basis to deny Modvat credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible, and the denial of credit was not sustainable.