Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether branded clearances eligible for exemption under the notification were to be included in the aggregate value of clearances for determining SSI eligibility, and whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay.
Analysis: The aggregate value of clearances for the earlier financial year had to be determined in terms of paragraph 3 of Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003. Clearances of branded goods, though otherwise covered by the notification because the factory was situated in a rural area under paragraph 4, were still required to be counted while computing the aggregate value. On that basis, the clearances for 2004-05 would cross the monetary limit, which would disentitle the assessee from SSI benefit for 2005-06. The additional plea regarding Cenvat credit was not supported by quantification or materials.
Conclusion: The appellants did not establish a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit or stay, and the full duty amount was required to be deposited.