Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported fish meal was covered by Sl. No. 15 of Notification No. 20/2006-Cus. dated 01.03.2006 as aquatic feed or as additives for aquatic feed, so as to qualify for exemption from additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The description in the notification covered aquatic feed and also additives for such feed. The imported goods were admittedly falling under Chapter 23. Even on the department's case that the goods were an input for manufacture of shrimp feed, they could still fall within the expression "additives" used in the notification. On the assessee's later contention that the goods were directly usable as poultry and cattle feed, the material relied upon, including HSN notes and other references, supported the view that fish meal is used as animal feed. The department also failed to produce material to support its assertion that the goods were excluded from the notification.
Conclusion: The imported goods were eligible for the benefit of the notification. The appeal of the Revenue was liable to fail.