Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled, at the prima facie stage, to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty and penalty demanded against them.
Analysis: The applicants had raised a claim for exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 from the relevant date, and the manufactured twine was stated to be produced from monofilament or multifilament yarn on which no credit of duty had been taken. The authority also noted that the product had been classified as Heading 5607 for a long period, the departmental understanding had earlier accepted that position, and the question of limitation was therefore open at least prima facie. On that basis, the demand and penalty were not found fit for immediate recovery pending appeal.
Conclusion: The applicants were held entitled to waiver of the entire pre-deposit and to stay of recovery until disposal of the appeals.
Final Conclusion: The interim relief sought by the applicants was granted, and recovery of the impugned duty and penalty was kept in abeyance during the pendency of the appeals.