Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's request to modify the earlier order deserved acceptance, and whether the existing appellate finding on entitlement to Cenvat credit for H.R. coils used in fabrication of pollution control equipment warranted interference.
Analysis: The earlier appellate order was found to be reasoned and self-contained. It had already recorded that H.R. coils used in fabrication of pollution control equipment were eligible for Cenvat credit, and that components, spares and accessories of such equipment falling under any chapter could qualify as capital goods for credit purposes. In these circumstances, reopening the matter through modification of the earlier order was held to be unwarranted.
Conclusion: The request for modification was rejected, and the earlier order was left undisturbed.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding was concluded against the Revenue, with no interference made in the existing appellate determination.
Ratio Decidendi: A reasoned and self-speaking appellate order should not be disturbed by a modification request absent any legal infirmity, and goods used in fabrication of pollution control equipment may qualify for Cenvat credit when their identity and use are established.