Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount equivalent to Education Cess was required to be deposited in the escrow account under Notification No. 69/03; (ii) Whether pre-deposit of penalty was required.
Issue (i): Whether the amount equivalent to Education Cess was required to be deposited in the escrow account under Notification No. 69/03.
Analysis: The notification was treated as requiring investment/deposit equivalent to the exemption granted. On that basis, there was no reason to exclude the Education Cess component from the amount to be deposited in the escrow account.
Conclusion: The Education Cess amount was held to be includible in the escrow deposit, and the direction to deposit the duty demand was upheld.
Issue (ii): Whether pre-deposit of penalty was required.
Analysis: The dispute was considered to be purely legal in character, and on that footing penalty was not viewed as attracted at the stage of stay.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of penalty was waived.
Final Conclusion: The appellant was required to make the escrow deposit for the duty demand, but the penalty pre-deposit was dispensed with.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification requires deposit equivalent to the exemption/investment, the Education Cess component is not excluded from the escrow deposit, and penalty pre-deposit may be waived when the dispute is purely legal.