Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activity of packing garments with packing materials and selling them to distributors amounted to manufacture under Note 4 to Chapters 61 and 62 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the assessee was entitled to waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The activity, on the material then available, did not appear to fall within the processes specified in the Chapter Note. The cartons used were second-hand and were not shown to bear labels, so the ingredients of labelling or relabelling were not established. In the absence of evidence that the goods were repacked from bulk packs satisfying the relevant statutory requirements, the allegation of repacking also remained unsubstantiated at that stage. Prima facie, the department had not established manufacture as contemplated by the Chapter Note.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled, at that stage, to waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery of the duty demand and penalties.