Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit in view of the prima facie availability of exemption under the relevant exemption notifications for clearance of furnace oil from the second warehouse.
Analysis: The notification denied exemption was not shown to contain any specific bar against the goods being cleared from the second warehouse. The explanation introduced by the later notification was treated as supporting the appellant's stand, and the claim that it was clarificatory was noted. The order also recorded the appellant's reliance on the warehousing arrangement under Rule 20 read with the applicable warehousing notification for petroleum products.
Conclusion: The appellant made out a prima facie case for the benefit of the exemption notifications and was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit pending disposal of the appeal.