Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty was sustainable when the imported vehicle was cleared at the port shown in the DGFT licence notwithstanding the restriction in the notification concerning import of new vehicles through specified ports.
Analysis: The import had been made against an EPCG licence that specifically mentioned Mumbai Airport as the port of clearance. In that situation, the importer could not be faulted for clearing the vehicle at the very port authorised in the licence. The objection based on the notification did not justify penal action against the importer on these facts.
Conclusion: The appeal seeking imposition of penalty failed and was rejected.