Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Circular No. 681 dated 8 March 1994, directing deduction of tax at source from payments to transport contractors for carriage of goods, was ultra vires section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the subsequent amendment by the Finance Act, 1995 could validate the circular retrospectively.
Analysis: Section 194C, as inserted by the Finance Act, 1972, applied to payments to contractors for "work" done, and the expression "work" as then explained did not include mere carriage of goods by motor transport. On that construction, the circular could not enlarge the scope of the substantive provision so as to require deduction at source from transport charges. The later amendment brought in by the Finance Act, 1995 was held to operate only prospectively and could not retrospectively ratify the earlier circular.
Conclusion: The circular was invalid and ultra vires section 194C, and deduction of tax at source could not be insisted upon for mere transportation of goods under the pre-amendment provision.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the circular failed, and the writ appeals were dismissed, leaving the assessees' position undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: A circular cannot expand the scope of section 194C beyond the meaning of "work" contained in the statute, and a later amendment that is prospective cannot retrospectively validate an earlier ultra vires circular.