Modvat credit denied for failure to prove rejected inputs matched the declared goods and were used in manufacture.

Modvat credit was denied because the assessee failed to prove that the goods received were the same inputs covered by its declaration and were in fact rejected or sub-standard materials used in manufacture. The invoice and Form D-3 referred to finished APCO synthetic enamel, not rejected paint, and the declaration described different inputs. As the record did not establish identity between the invoiced goods and the declared inputs, and no reliable material showed that the consignment was sub-standard or rejected, the goods were treated as finished marketable products. Demand and penalty were therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the goods received by the appellant as allegedly rejected or in-process paint, and whether the appellant proved that the goods covered by the invoice and declaration were the same inputs intended for use in the manufacture of the final product.

Analysis: The invoice described the goods as finished APCO synthetic enamel and did not indicate that they were rejected or in-process paint. The Form D-3 intimation also referred to receipt of APCO synthetic enamel for use in manufacture of Ampro, but likewise did not show that the goods were rejected material. The declaration filed for Modvat credit covered different described inputs, and the record did not establish that the invoiced goods matched those declared inputs or were actually used as rejected inputs in manufacture of the appellant's product. The appellant failed to produce material showing that the consignment was sub-standard or rejected, and the authorities below relied on the documents and surrounding circumstances to conclude that the goods were finished marketable products.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible, because the appellant did not prove that the goods were rejected inputs covered by its declaration and fit for credit under the scheme.

Final Conclusion: The demand and penalty were sustained, and the appeal failed on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit is available only for inputs actually covered by the filing and description in the declaration, and the assessee must establish by reliable material that the goods received were the declared rejected or sub-standard inputs used in manufacture.

---