Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a foreign bank, was entitled to claim the benefit of the non-discrimination clause in the India-Korea Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement so as to be taxed at the rate applicable to a co-operative society rather than at the higher rate applicable to a foreign company.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of the Explanation inserted in section 90(2), which declared that taxation of a foreign company at a rate higher than that of a domestic company would not be regarded as less favourable treatment. The assessee sought to compare itself with an Indian co-operative society carrying on banking activities and contended that the treaty protection extended beyond comparison with a domestic company. The Tribunal held that the statutory Explanation formed an integral part of section 90(2) and specifically neutralised any claim based on a higher rate of tax on a foreign company when compared with a domestic company. On that basis, no comparison with the tax rate applicable to a co-operative society could be made for the foreign bank.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the non-discrimination benefit claimed, and the higher rate of tax applicable to the foreign company was sustained.