Job-work exemption and Cenvat credit principles justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.

In a job-work exemption dispute, the tribunal read Notification No. 214/86 as covering clearances used in the principal manufacturer's final products, and treated the reference to a manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products as applying to the principal manufacturer rather than the job worker. Education Cess payment was taken as indicating that the tractors were not wholly exempt from duty, and the record showed credit entitlement on duty-paid inputs used in the assemblies. On that basis, a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was established, and interim relief was granted by waiving pre-deposit and keeping coercive recovery in abeyance pending the appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty demand and penalties, having regard to the scope of Notification No. 214/86, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and the effect of Education Cess under the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004.

Analysis: The notification was read as applying to job-work clearances where the manufactured goods are used in the manufacture of the principal manufacturer's final products, and the reference in clause (a)(iii) to a manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products was held to point to the supplier of inputs, not the job worker. The payment of Education Cess was treated as showing that the tractors were not wholly exempted from duty. The record also showed entitlement to credit on duty-paid inputs used in the RAC assemblies, with substantial documentary support and partial payment already made.

Conclusion: The applicants established a prima facie case for relief. The pre-deposit of duty and penalties was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted in favour of the appellants, and coercive recovery was kept in abeyance during the pendency of the appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: In a job-work exemption, the reference to the manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products pertains to the principal manufacturer whose final products use the job-worked goods, and a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit may arise where duty-paid input credit is demonstrably available and the final products are not wholly exempt from duty.

---