Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on inputs as such and on inputs contained in semi-finished goods lying in stock on the date when the final product became exempt, and whether pre-deposit should be directed under the appeal-stage discretion.
Analysis: Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 denies credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods. On a prima facie view, inputs as such in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished goods on the date of exemption fall within that restriction. The earlier authority relied upon by the assessee was distinguished on the basis that the factual setting there involved a different rule and different stage of clearance of the final product. In the circumstances, complete waiver was not granted, though a lenient approach was adopted on the quantum of deposit.
Conclusion: The assessee was held not to have a prima facie case for full waiver in respect of the disputed credit on inputs in stock and semi-finished goods, and was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 50,00,000.
Final Conclusion: The order granted only partial relief at the stay stage by requiring a substantial pre-deposit, while leaving the merits of the credit dispute open for adjudication in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit under the Cenvat scheme is not prima facie available for inputs used in exempted final products, including inputs embedded in semi-finished goods in stock on the date of exemption.