Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2007 (2) TMI 345 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal classifies shares as investments, directs AO to determine fair market value for capital gains. The Tribunal upheld the classification of shares as investments and treated the resulting loss as a capital loss. The AO was directed to determine the ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal classifies shares as investments, directs AO to determine fair market value for capital gains.

                              The Tribunal upheld the classification of shares as investments and treated the resulting loss as a capital loss. The AO was directed to determine the fair market value of the shares at the date of conversion for computing capital gains and business profits. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Classification of shares as investment or stock-in-trade.
                              2. Applicability of Accounting Standards.
                              3. Determination of loss as business loss or capital loss.
                              4. Treatment of conversion of investment into stock-in-trade under section 2(47)(iv) and section 45(2).

                              Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Classification of Shares as Investment or Stock-in-Trade:
                              The primary issue was whether the shares held by the assessee-company were investments or stock-in-trade. The assessee claimed that the shares were initially misclassified as investments due to an error and were actually intended to be stock-in-trade. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] disagreed, relying on the treatment given by the assessee in its books of account, where the shares were shown as investments. The Tribunal upheld the authorities' view, noting that the shares were treated as investments in the previous year and there was no evidence to suggest an error or misclassification. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory requirements for maintaining books of account and the process through which financial statements undergo, concluding that the shares were indeed investments up to 31-3-1995.

                              2. Applicability of Accounting Standards:
                              The assessee argued that the valuation of shares should be in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS) 13 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), which mandates that investments should be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower. The AO and CIT(A) noted that AS-13 was not notified by the Government, and thus not mandatory. The Tribunal agreed with this view, stating that the change in accounting policy or rectification should have been disclosed in the financial statements, which was not done by the assessee.

                              3. Determination of Loss as Business Loss or Capital Loss:
                              The assessee claimed a loss of Rs. 56,65,082 due to the reduction in the market value of shares, treating it as a business loss. The AO and CIT(A) treated this as a short-term capital loss, arguing that the conversion of shares from investment to stock-in-trade constituted a transfer under section 2(47)(iv). The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the loss from the conversion of shares should be treated as a capital loss and not a business loss. The Tribunal noted that the shares were held as investments and the conversion to stock-in-trade was an afterthought to claim the loss as a business loss.

                              4. Treatment of Conversion of Investment into Stock-in-Trade under Section 2(47)(iv) and Section 45(2):
                              The Tribunal held that the conversion of shares from investment to stock-in-trade constituted a transfer under section 2(47)(iv). The profits or gains arising from such conversion should be computed as per section 45(2), which states that the fair market value of the asset on the date of conversion should be considered as the full value of the consideration for computing capital gains. The AO did not determine the fair market value of the shares as on the date of conversion due to the assessee's failure to provide details. The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO to ascertain the fair market value of the shares as on 1-4-1995 and compute the capital gains and business profits accordingly.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal upheld the authorities' classification of shares as investments and the treatment of the resultant loss as a capital loss. It directed the AO to determine the fair market value of the shares as on the date of conversion and compute the capital gains and business profits accordingly. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found