Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit lying in the RG 23A Part II account could be utilized for duty payment on alloy steel ingots when the manufacturer had opted for the compounded levy scheme for non-alloy steel ingots.
Analysis: The relevant notification under section 3A applied only to notified goods of non-alloy steel falling within the specified tariff headings. The restriction in Rule 57F(17)(c) caused the unutilised credit to lapse only in relation to manufacturers of non-alloy steel ingots and billets falling under the specified headings. Alloy steel ingots were outside the scope of the notification and the restrictive sub-rule. The credit used by the appellant related to inputs used for alloy steel ingots, not to inputs used for non-alloy steel ingots.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was admissible for payment of duty on alloy steel ingots and could not be denied on the ground that the appellant had opted for the compounded levy scheme for non-alloy steel ingots.
Final Conclusion: The denial of credit and the consequent penalty were set aside, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A restriction on Modvat credit under the compounded levy scheme applies only to the notified goods and tariff headings to which the scheme is made applicable, and does not bar utilization of credit for non-notified goods manufactured in the same factory.