Interest on Loans for Shares Deductible in Short-Term Gains; Not Part of Acquisition Cost, Tribunal Rules.

The Tribunal ruled that the interest paid on borrowed funds for purchasing shares should be deducted when computing short-term capital gains, overturning the Assessing Officer's disallowance. However, it held that interest paid after acquiring the shares cannot be included in the cost of acquisition for capital gains computation, aligning with legislative provisions and precedents. The Tribunal allowed the revenue's appeal, emphasizing that such interest falls under revenue deductions, not as part of the acquisition cost.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of interest claimed in computing short-term capital gains.
2. Allowability of interest paid on borrowed funds as part of the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Interest in Computing Short-term Capital Gains

The appellant, a Chartered Accountant, purchased shares using borrowed funds and later sold them to repay the loan. The Assessing Officer disallowed a portion of the interest paid on the loan, leading to a short-term capital gain. The CIT(A) overturned this decision, stating that the interest should be considered part of the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer's disallowance lacked justification, as the interest was actually paid and should be deducted in computing the short-term capital gains. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the entire interest amount, deleting the earlier disallowed sum.

Issue 2: Allowability of Interest on Borrowed Funds as Cost of Acquisition

The dispute revolved around whether interest paid on borrowed funds for the period between share acquisition and sale could be considered part of the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains. The revenue argued that only specific deductions listed in section 48 of the Act are allowable, excluding interest on borrowed funds. The appellant contended that interest should be included in the cost of acquisition based on a Madras High Court decision. However, the Tribunal held that interest paid post-acquisition cannot be considered part of the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal emphasized that legislative provisions allow deductions only as specified under different heads, and interest on borrowed funds falls under revenue deductions, not cost of acquisition. The Tribunal cited precedents and Supreme Court decisions to support its conclusion, affirming that interest paid post-acquisition cannot be added to the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the revenue's appeal, emphasizing that interest paid on borrowed funds post-acquisition cannot be treated as part of the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains. The judgment clarified the distinction between cost of acquisition and revenue deductions, ensuring adherence to legislative provisions and established legal principles in determining taxable capital gains.

---