Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty on the ground that the goods cleared were classifiable as power driven pump sets and covered by the exemption notification.
Analysis: The applicants manufactured I.C. engines and procured pumps from the market, which were cleared together as power driven pump sets. The Board's circular and the cited precedent supported the view that such goods could be treated as power driven pump sets under Heading 84.13. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the applicants had a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and stay was granted in favour of the applicants.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted on the footing that the cleared goods were prima facie classifiable as power driven pump sets, making the exemption claim arguable at the stay stage.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stay stage, where the cleared goods are prima facie classifiable under the claimed tariff heading and supported by the exemption position, waiver of pre-deposit may be granted.