Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the block assessment under section 158BD was barred by limitation by reason of the date on which notice was served, and whether the defect in the notice could be cured under section 292B.
Analysis: The limitation under section 158BE(2)(a) for an other person referred to in section 158BD runs from the end of the month in which the notice under the chapter is served. The notice originally issued on 8-7-1996 was treated by the Assessing Officer himself as a notice under section 158BD, and the subsequent letter dated 9-8-1996 was only clarificatory and not an independent fresh notice. On that basis, the starting point of limitation was 8-7-1996, so the assessment had to be completed by 31-7-1997. As the assessment was completed only on 27-8-1997, it was time-barred. The defect was held not to be a mere curable irregularity and section 292B could not save an assessment that was barred by limitation.
Conclusion: The block assessment was invalid and void for limitation, and the assessee's objection succeeded.