Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of duty paid on single yarn could be denied merely because the credit was taken on the basis of the assessee's own invoices covering despatch of the goods to job workers for conversion into double yarn.
Analysis: The input single yarn was duty paid and used in the manufacture chain leading to the final product. The doubled yarn received back from the job workers was an intermediate product, and the invoices issued by the assessee for despatch of the single yarn to the job workers were treated as proper duty-paying documents. The same question had already been decided by the Bench in favour of the assessee, and that reasoning was followed. The credit was held to be admissible on the strength of the invoices issued by the assessee, coupled with delivery challans and the subsequent use of the goods in manufacture.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit could not be denied on the ground that the assessee used its own invoices for the job-work movement of the input, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned disallowance was set aside and the assessee was held entitled to the credit claimed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-paid inputs are actually used in the manufacturing chain, Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the movement of goods to and from job workers was evidenced by the assessee's own invoices and allied delivery documents.