Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on an Alarm annunciator classified under Heading 85.31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The dispute was confined to eligibility of capital goods credit for an Alarm annunciator classified under Heading 85.31. The relevant period was one in which capital goods falling under Heading 85.31 were excluded from the goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1). The applicability of the provision depended on the tariff entry covering the capital goods, and not on their use in manufacture of the final product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible, and the denial of credit was upheld in favour of the Revenue.