Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under the Central Excise Rules was sustainable when duty on clearance of samples was paid immediately on discovery of the mistake, before issuance of the show cause notice, and the clearance was made under a bona fide belief without mala fide intention.
Analysis: The assessee cleared finished goods as free samples without payment of duty and without issuing invoice, but the duty was deposited immediately after the error was noticed and before issuance of the show cause notice. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the clearance was under a bona fide belief that free supplies were not dutiable and that there was no intention to evade duty. In these circumstances, penalty was held to be unwarranted, consistent with the view that where duty is voluntarily paid before notice and mala fide is absent, penal action is not attracted.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable and the order setting aside the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty is paid immediately upon discovery of the mistake and before issuance of the show cause notice, and the clearance occurs under a bona fide belief without mala fide intent, penalty under the Central Excise Rules is not imposable.