Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether garments declared as 100% cotton and falling under Chapter 61 were entitled to the benefit of Sl. No. 41 of Notification No. 7/2003-CE despite the presence of 3% polyester yarn used for adornment, and whether pre-deposit and recovery of the demanded differential duty and penalty were liable to be waived.
Analysis: The goods were found to be garments of cotton, with polyester yarn used only to adorn them by way of stripes. The explanation appended to Sl. No. 41 of the notification clarified that cotton knitted or crocheted apparel would not be excluded merely because they contained sewing threads, cords, labels, elastic tapes, zip fasteners, or similar items of other materials used for stitching, fastening, holding, or adornment. The objection of the lower authority proceeded only on the presence of polyester content, without giving due weight to the purpose for which it was used. On the admitted facts, the notification benefit was prima facie available.
Conclusion: The assessee was prima facie entitled to clear the goods at 8% under Sl. No. 41, and the demand for differential duty was not sustainable at the interim stage. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.