Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Department's application for rectification under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was barred by limitation and whether delay could be condoned.
Analysis: The prescribed period for filing an application under Section 35C(2) is six months from the date of the final order. The provision contains no power for condonation of delay. The application was filed beyond six months from the date of the final order and was therefore beyond the period fixed by Parliament.
Conclusion: The application was time-barred and not maintainable; the request for rectification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute prescribes a fixed limitation period for filing a rectification application and does not provide for condonation, an application filed beyond that period must be rejected as time-barred.