Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Applicability of Notification No. 50/97-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 57/97-C.E., to hot re-rolled products lying in stock on 31-8-1997 when the compounded levy scheme was introduced.
Analysis: The stock related to goods produced before 1-9-1997. The amended notification extended the benefit of Notification No. 50/97-C.E. to products produced prior to 1-9-1997 and altered the relevant nominal centre distance criterion. On the record, there was no material showing that the nominal centre distance exceeded the prescribed limit, and the Revenue did not controvert the finding recorded by the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the lower duty rate under Serial No. 3 was rightly applied.
Conclusion: The issue is decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty did not survive on the facts found, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the amended exemption notification applies to goods produced before the relevant cut-off date and there is no evidence that the applicable product specification condition is breached, the benefit under the appropriate serial entry must be allowed.